Managing Processes, Managing Success: Stevens’ BPM & SI Program

Sometimes it’s not what you do, but how you do it that ensures success—a motto echoed by the Business Process Management & Service Innovation program at Stevens Institute of Technology. According to Dr. Michael zur Muehlen, director of the  Center for Business Process Innovation, the program looks at an organization through the process lens in […]

New Book: BPM 2010 Workshops

Michael zur Muehlen, Jianwen Su (eds.): Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2010 International Workshops and Education Track, Hoboken, NJ, USA, September 13-15, 2010, Revised Selected Papers. This book constitutes the thoroughly refereed post-workshop proceedings of nine international workshops held in Hoboken, NJ, USA, in conjunction with the 8th International Conference on Business Process Management, BPM […]

The Case for Conformance

It is hard to call the Business Process Modeling Notation anything but a success. Stephen White and the other members of the BPMN standardization group have spent nearly 10 years developing and fine-tuning a common graphical representation for business processes, and both tool support and user uptake have been heartening. But BPMN never had one […]

BPMN Primitives for the Department of Defense

One of the features in BPMN 2.0 are four different subclasses of BPMN that reduce the number of modeling constructs to cater for different modeling purposes and levels of sophistication. One of these four classes is the analytic conformance class, modeled after the Department of Defense’s BPMN primitives. Robert Shapiro gave a presentation on the state […]

Stevens/QUT study explains how organizations document their business processes

Study finds that business process modelers use just 20% of standard business process modeling notation HOBOKEN, N.J., June 8, 2008 — Researchers from Stevens Institute of Technology and Queensland University of Technology have published a study that explains how organizations document their business processes using a visual notation. The study found that although a standard […]

Who is at fault – the language or the speaker?

As researchers, Jan Recker and I find it challenging to strike a balance between our efforts to meet the academic standards required by the wider research community and the demands regarding accessibility, relevance, timeliness and appropriateness instilled by the wider practitioner communities. We were happy to find that our blogging about research results inspires the […]

How much BPMN do you need?

by Michael zur Muehlen ( and Jan Recker ( BPMN is the de facto standard for graphical process modeling. While there are other graphical languages to represent processes (EPCs, IDEF, Flowcharts, Petri Nets, among others), no other notation has seen such an uptake in such a short time as BPMN has. It is widely supported […]

Bigger is better? A look at the complexity of BPM standards

I am attending the BPM Think Tank in Burlingame this week, and there are many insightful presentations around emerging standards in the BPM space, such as BPDM, BPMM, BMM, BPMN 2.0 and OSRM. But one thing makes me wonder – with every revision, every iteration, the standard specifications grow in size. The new BPMM specification […]